Areas of Practice

Non-Compete Agreements: Defenses

 Overtime - Wage & Hour
 Sexual Harassment
 Retaliation
 Non-Compete Q&A
 Wage Disputes

Orlando, Florida Non-Compete
Agreement Lawyer / Attorney

Non-Compete Agreement Defenses

The most effective defense to a non-compete agreement is that the employer materially breached the contract between it and the former employee prior to the employee's alleged breach, thereby obviating any obligation on the part of the employee to comply with same.

Florida law holds that an employer's material breach of an employment contract is a relevant factor in determining whether an employer is entitled to a temporary injunction enforcing a covenant not to compete. In the case Cordis Corporation v. Prooslin, 482 So.2d 486 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), the court affirmed the trial court's decision to deny a temporary injunction where there was evidence that the employer's breach of the underlying contract cast doubt on whether or not the employer was clearly entitled to success on the merits.

The Prooslin court recognized that if an employer is in breach or default under an agreement or when he gives good cause for a former employee's non-performance he has no standing in equity to seek an injunction. The Prooslin court noted that the trial court's discretion in granting a temporary injunction should be guided by established rules and principles of equity jurisprudence.

In the case of Troup v. Heacock, 367 So.2d 691 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), the appellate court reversed the trial court's decision that granted a motion for temporary injunction. The appellate court noted that the employer had materially breached the employment contract and therefore the covenant not to compete was unenforceable by the employer. The Troup court stated that if the injunction were allowed to stand not only would it be contrary to equity but it would result in inverse peonage.

Numerous other Florida cases have recognized the a prior material breach by an employer will discharge an employee from abiding by a covenant not to compete. Generally Seaboard Oil Co. v Donovan, 128 So. 821 (Fla. 1930); Sarasota Beverage Company v. Johnson, 551 So.2d 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989) (en banc); Channell v. Applied Research, Inc., 472 So.2d 1260,1262 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Thomas v. Fed, Ins. Agency, 51 B.R. 653 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1985).

Similarly, whether the employee while employed was subjected to discrimination and/or employment actions which were illegal or against public policy may create a defense toward enforcement of a covenant or other duty under the doctrines of unclean hands, or equitable estoppel, etc. Moreover, the employer's subsequent actions (i.e., anti-competitive activity, tortious interference, etc.) arguably could prevent it from obtaining the relief sought under these theories. In Lee & Associates, Inc., of North Florida v. Lee, the court held that where the specific contract language provided, a covenant not-to-compete in an employment contract did not apply to the employee who was not discharged for good cause and did not voluntarily leave his employment. Violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act/Overtime, is a frequently used defense to enforcement of a non-compete agreement.

Obviously, all monetary and breach of contract claims should be asserted specifically. These may include claims for payment of salary, severance pay, commissions, expense reimbursement, vacation and sick pay, etc.


CONCLUSION

An employee must contend with many concerns when faced with restrictive covenant litigation. Being cognizant of the time, expense and commitment required, the most prudent course is for the employee to consult with counsel early and work out a plan of action before he or she leaves the place of employment. In view of the high stakes involved, all defenses to injunctive relief should be investigated and vigorously pursued.

For a confidential consultation regarding potential employment dispute cases, contact the Law Office of N. James Turner, Esq., P.A. at (407) 422-6464


The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely on advertisements. Before you decide on the hiring of a lawyer, you should learn about the lawyer's qualifications and experience.

Se Habla Espaρol
Board Certified
Civil Trial Lawyer
Board Certified Business
Litigation Lawyer
Certified Mediator
Over 31 Years
of Legal Experience
Call today:  (407) 422-6464
























































 

 


Eola Park Centre   •   200 East Robinson Street   •   Suite 220   •   Orlando, Florida 32801

Phone:  (407) 422-6464   •   Fax:  422-6516   •   Direct E-Mail:  njtlaw@gmail.com


Home   •   N. James Turner, Esq.   •   Contact Us   •   Overtime   •   Non-Compete Agreements   •   Wage Disputes   •   Retaliation

Non-Compete Strategies   •   Non-Compete Defenses   •   Recent Successes

 


 

 © Copyright  2007  N. James Turner, Esq. All rights reserved.
 

N. James Turner, Esq.  participates in the following Attorney Guide Programs: Orlando Attorney Guide